Access to Justice

Question: What does “access to justice” mean in Ontario, and what can a swalm paralegal professional corporation like NoviceDriver.legal do to help me get a fair outcome without paying for a full trial?

Answer:   In Ontario, “access to justice” means people can realistically enforce their rights and defend themselves in court with timely, affordable, proportionate processes so the decision-maker can reach genuine truth based on the facts; as the Supreme Court of Canada noted in Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, trials are increasingly expensive and many Canadians cannot afford to sue or defend to trial, which can threaten fair outcomes.   At NoviceDriver.legal, a swalm paralegal professional corporation, our team can help you understand your options, gather and organize evidence, prepare documents, and pursue summary or more streamlined next steps where appropriate so your matter moves forward without unnecessary red tape.   If you are dealing with costs, delays, or difficulty presenting your case, call (647) 559-3377 to book an intake and get clear, practical guidance for your situation.

Understanding the Importance of 'Access to Justice'

An orderly, as opposed to chaotic, civilized democratic society requires a system of law that works for, and is seen as working for, the citizens of that society.  The citizens need to perceive that the justice system functions in a manner that supports, encourages, and enables the revealing of genuine truth and that the laws of society will be applied to the genuine truth.  Unfortunately, as stated in Hryniak v. Mauldin, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, obtaining the opportunity to obtain or receive a genuinely fair hearing where genuine truth is presented to a fact finder, such as a judge or jury, who then apply the law, is becoming more and more difficult in Canada.  Accordingly, legal cases wherein people are unable to afford adequate legal representation and unable to present the genuine truth may, and likely are, leading to injustice involving false facts, misapplication of the law, and unjust outcomes.  Specifically in Hyniak, the Supreme Court said:

[1]  Ensuring access to justice is the greatest challenge to the rule of law in Canada today.  Trials have become increasingly expensive and protracted.  Most Canadians cannot afford to sue when they are wronged or defend themselves when they are sued, and cannot afford to go to trial.  Without an effective and accessible means of enforcing rights, the rule of law is threatened.  Without public adjudication of civil cases, the development of the common law is stunted.

[2]  Increasingly, there is recognition that a culture shift is required in order to create an environment promoting timely and affordable access to the civil justice system.  This shift entails simplifying pre-trial procedures and moving the emphasis away from the conventional trial in favour of proportional procedures tailored to the needs of the particular case.  The balance between procedure and access struck by our justice system must come to reflect modern reality and recognize that new models of adjudication can be fair and just.

In effort of making access to justice available for Canadians, the system of justice itself is undergoing remodeling with 'summary processes' that attempt to reduce the volume of red tape, among other things, that impair the affordability of the representation that affects the capacity for many average Canadians to afford, and thereby access, justice.

Additional Information Resources

• The Canadian Bar Association
• Government of Canada, Department of Justice
• Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
• The Action Group on Access to Justice 
• Law Commission of Ontario
• Government of Ontario